The fresh survey contained step three bits. Region I provided inquiries regarding socio-group data (decades, level of education, parity, familial income, career, latest marital standing, sexual craft, history of HPV vaccination, and reputation for unusual cervical cancer tumors testing).
Region II comprised of six Thai sexede kvinder questions about the mark women that might be processed, years to begin with, frequency, decades or conditions to cease out of screening, and techniques from tests. Only the members who’d ever heard regarding HPV do go ahead to Part III and that assessed knowledge about HPV from its types of (oncogenic otherwise non-oncogenic), setting from indication and you can prevention.
Ahead of the research, the survey off region II and you will region III during the Thai adaptation was basically contemplated, chatted about, and you will modified up to consensus among 20 boffins who were all of the gynecologic oncologists (certain have been writers in other synchronous training). The pros rated each of 19 questions due to the fact both ‘relevant’ otherwise ‘maybe not relevant’. The item-peak Articles Authenticity Directory (I-CVI) was calculated per goods, therefore the Stuff Legitimacy Index (CVI) try determined by taking the common proportion out-of fourteen questions relating to understanding of cervical cancer tumors examination and 5 questions relating to HPV. The latest CVI were step one for both parts of the questionnaire (S1 Desk). New accuracy is checked out when you look at the 30 women with similar characteristic because people. The latest Cronbach’ alpha coefficients to your precision was indeed 0.819 to possess information about cervical malignant tumors evaluation and 0.907 to have understanding of HPV.
Research range
For the day out of scheduled colposcopy, the research assistant given advice of your own studies to your women which found introduction conditions. The women exactly who provided to take part gave authored told consent and you may answered the brand new questionnaire individually by themselves ahead of continuing so you can colposcopy.
Investigation amassed because of it data was socio-market studies (Region We of the questionnaire), experience with cervical cancer evaluating (Region II), and you may experience in HPV (Part III).
Statistical research
The newest responses of knowledge on the cervical malignant tumors screening and you may HPV have been reviewed by each product ahead of rating categorization. Correct answer is scored as the step one while ‘incorrect and you may being unsure of answer’ was scored 0.
Off 14 questions regarding cervical cancers examination, feminine whose get was in fact ? ten was in fact randomly classified given that which have ‘good knowledge’ usually have been considered as with “bad knowledge”. To have experience with HPV, women whose address try ‘never ever observed HPV’ had been excluded regarding the studies of HPV training.
Regarding 5 concerns, women whoever score was indeed ? step three was in fact regarded as having ‘a good expertise in HPV’ or else just like the ‘not-good knowledge’. Out-of 19 issues, feminine whose rating had been ? 13 was categorized given that that have ‘a great total knowledge’ or else since ‘not-good overall knowledge’.
All of the data was indeed gathered into the an electronic digital database and you will assessed playing with SPSS V.twenty-six.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chi town, IL, USA). Descriptive analytics were used to analyze group investigation and you may was in fact summarized once the quantity which have commission, indicate having basic deviation or average having assortment. New connection between each varying and you can studies score had been reviewed using simple linear regression. Exploratory model was developed into the multivariable data along with all of the parameters probably related to the information score. This new thought amount of analytical benefit is actually a p-worth of 0.05 otherwise shorter.
Overall performance
Out of 500 women who met inclusion criteria and were invited to the study, one ong 499 women who responded to the questionnaire about knowledge of cervical cancer and screening (part II) and knowledge about HPV (part II), two did not provide personal information. So demographic data were available in only 497 women (Table 1). The mean age of 497 participants was years (SD ± ). More than half of the participants were aged < 40>
